๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข


Channel's geo and language: India, English
Category: Law


๐Ÿ“ฒContact โ€”> @CurrentLegalGKBOT

๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ Setting Precedents: Cases are our commentaries.
๐Ÿง For Daily Quiz โ€”> @LegalQuizzes
โณ๐Ÿš€Enjoy_Learning

Related channels  |  Similar channels

Channel's geo and language
India, English
Category
Law
Statistics
Posts filter








20460002183202429125-583953-583994.pdf
466.6Kb
โœจ The Res Integra

"Whether a married person living with an unmarried
person, without dissolution of his/her marriage or/and
whether two married persons with two different marriages living in live-in-relationship, without dissolution of their marriages, are entitled to get protection order from the Court ?"

Let the matter be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice on the administrative side for constitution of Special/Larger Bench to answer the aforesaid question, referred by this Court.

@CurrentLegalGK






Too much important to article and too much important to read the detailed brief of Bachhan singh judgment.


In suo motu proceedings instituted in 2022 (IN RE: Framing Guidelines Regarding Potential Mitigating Circumstances To Be Considered While Imposing Death Sentences), the SC asked whether sentences delivered on the same day as the conviction satisfy the requirement of a meaningful and effective hearing.

@CurrentLegalGK




Pdhlena 2025 rules and the act name and the GK behind it.

pehele kahan unified nahi tha ye zaroor dekhna




#Question@CurrentLegalGK

The police file a chargesheet against A for attempting to murder B, and the court frames the charges accordingly. However, when the trial begins, the accused states that the alleged attempt to murder was an act of private defense against sexual assault and produces evidence in support thereof.

Decide the further course of action






Even if it is assumed that the Respondent's mother had relations with the Appellant during her marriage and especially when the Respondent was begotten, such a fact per se, would not be sufficient to displace the presumption of legitimacy. The only thing that such an allegation sheds light on is the fact that there seems to have been simultaneous access with the Respondent's mother, by the Appellant and Mr. RK. What, however, needs to be clarified is that an 'additional' access or 'multiple' access does not automatically negate the access between the spouses and prove non-access thereof. Consequently, there is a statutory mandate that the Respondent must be presumed to be the son of RK




๐Ÿ™‚ ab 70% or practice ke beech me difference dikhayi dega?








#Essay@CurrentLegalGK

Teaching has become a 2nd career option, comment

500 words - for structure go through pinned messages.

20 last posts shown.