Telegram-канал "𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™" — @CurrentLegalGK

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

8 Nov, 15:52

😶 As a Judge How are you going to Punish these type of offenders (if there are no others mitigating facts)

@CurrentLegalGK

316 0 0

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

8 Nov, 15:51

*बीच सड़क पर रोका, 3 गोलियां मारीं:* हत्या की सजा काट रहे युवक का मर्डर; कनाडा से कॉन्ट्रैक्ट किलिंग का शक
https://dainik.bhaskar.com/GZFu83VwlOb

बीच सड़क पर रोका, 3 गोलियां...

हत्या की सजा काट रहे युवक का मर्डर; कनाडा से...

319 0 2

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

8 Nov, 14:34

Criteria To Determine Minority Status Of Educational Institution Under Article 30 : Supreme Court Explains In AMU Case
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/criteria-to-determine-minority-status-of-educational-institution-under-article-30-supreme-court-explains-in-amu-case-274655

Criteria To Determine Minority Status Of Educational Institution Under Article 30 : Supreme Court Explains In AMU Case

In the Aligarh Muslim University case, Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, in the majority judgment, outlined key criteria for determining an educational institution's entitlement to minority...

462 0 1

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

8 Nov, 14:32

*यूपी में पुरुष टेलर महिलाओं का नाप नहीं ले सकेंगे:* कानपुर हत्याकांड के बाद महिला आयोग का आदेश, जिम में महिला ट्रेनर जरूरी
https://dainik.bhaskar.com/EAH1JEbAlOb

यूपी में पुरुष टेलर महिलाओं का माप नहीं ले...

महिला आयोग ने सरकार को भेजा प्रस्ताव;...

421 0 1

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

8 Nov, 14:10

Minority Status Not Lost Merely Because Institution Was Created By Statute; AMU Minority Claim To Be Decided Based On Who Established It : Supreme Court By 4: 3
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/minority-status-not-lost-merely-because-institution-was-created-by-statute-amu-minority-claim-to-be-decided-based-on-who-established-it-supreme-court-by-4-3-274599

Minority Status Not Lost Merely Because Institution Was Created By Statute; AMU Minority Claim To Be Decided Based On Who Established It : Supreme Court By 4: 3

In the case relating to the minority status of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), a 7-judge bench of the Supreme Court (by 4:3 majority), overruled the 1967 judgment in S. Azeez Basha vs. Union Of...

450 0 1

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

8 Nov, 00:34

🌟How reference to larger bench is given to avoid breach of doctrine of staire decisis

✓ Precedent used- Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community vs. State of Maharashtra, (2005

📙 For Detailed Critical discussion-
After 2 Recent dissents by Bela M trivedi (sub classification case) and BV nagarathana (Mineral development case)
on reasons to be provided by smaller bench when referring (read more)

🖼️ Image from—
Sita Soren v. Union of India, 2023

#Discernible_Topics@CurrentLegalGK

900 0 5 2

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

7 Nov, 22:20

🌟 One reason Why Medical professional comes under section 2(42) of Consumer protection Act, 2019 [Definition of service]

Dharangadhara Chemical Works Ltd. v. State of Saurashtra, 1957
A contract for services' implies a contract whereby one party undertakes to render services e.g. professional or technical services, to or for another in the performance of which he is not subject to detailed direction and control but exercises professional or technical skill and uses his own knowledge and discretion. [See : Oxford Companion to Law, P. 1134].

A contract of service' implies relationship of master and servant and involves an obligation to obey orders in the work to be performed and as to its mode and manner of performance. [See : Stroud's Judicial Dictionary, 5th Edn., P. 540; Simmons v. Heath Laundry Co. (1910)
and Dharangadhara Chemical Works (supra)

🌟 For point wise difference see-

Contract 'of' Personal Service is excluded in service definition [2(42)]

Doctor and patient relationship can be based on mutual trust but not like master and servant thereby it is not OF but FOR.

Now the court has rejected the reference to reconsider the Indian Medical Association vs V.P. Shantha, 1995 case as it was irrelevant because court had decided lawyers case on its own merit w/o considering this case, this 1995 case can be reconsidered in future if factual foundation warrants so.

@CurrentLegalGK

830 0 3 4