EWS judgement.pdf
Summary of the judgement by MP high court in the EWS case:
1. The court ruled against the petitioners, stating that the government has the discretion to frame policies regarding reservations and relaxations.
2. Since EWS is constitutionally recognized as a separate category, it cannot automatically claim the same relaxations as SC/ST/OBC candidates.
3. The court also upheld the distinction between state and central OBC lists, dismissing the argument that state OBCs should receive the same benefits as central OBCs.
Nothing changes for EWS. No relaxation of attempts and age from the court.
1. The court ruled against the petitioners, stating that the government has the discretion to frame policies regarding reservations and relaxations.
2. Since EWS is constitutionally recognized as a separate category, it cannot automatically claim the same relaxations as SC/ST/OBC candidates.
3. The court also upheld the distinction between state and central OBC lists, dismissing the argument that state OBCs should receive the same benefits as central OBCs.
Nothing changes for EWS. No relaxation of attempts and age from the court.