ChatGPT in Medicine by MEDIROBOT

What future research directions are suggested based on the study's findings and limitations?
Human-Computer Interaction Studies: Further studies are needed to determine how LLMs like o1-preview enhance human-computer interaction in clinical settings.
Development of New Benchmarks: New, more challenging, and realistic benchmarks are needed to assess AI models in medical reasoning.
Clinical Trials: Clinical trials are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of AI models in real-world settings and their impact on patient outcomes.
Workforce Training: Training programs are needed to integrate AI systems into clinical practice and prepare clinicians to work effectively with these tools.
Expansion to Other Medical Specialties: Studies are needed to assess the performance of AI models in other medical specialties beyond internal medicine.

Triage Differential Diagnosis: Measuring the model's ability to identify "cannot-miss" diagnoses during the initial triage presentation of a patient.
Probabilistic Reasoning: Testing the model's ability to estimate pre-test and post-test probabilities in various clinical scenarios.
Management Reasoning: Evaluating the model's ability to suggest appropriate management steps for clinical cases, using Grey Matters Management Cases and Landmark Diagnostic Cases.
a. What was the primary outcome measured in these experiments? The primary outcome was the comparison of the o1-preview model's output to historical human controls and the outputs of previous LLMs, particularly GPT-4, on the same tasks. Physician experts with validated psychometrics were used to adjudicate the quality of the AI's performance.
What were the key findings of the study regarding the AI model's performance compared to human physicians and previous AI models?
Overall: The o1-preview model demonstrated superhuman performance on many of the medical reasoning tasks, surpassing both human physicians and previous AI models in several areas.
a. In which areas did the AI model demonstrate significant improvements?
Differential Diagnosis Generation: The model showed significant improvements in generating accurate differential diagnoses compared to GPT-4 and previous models.
Quality of Diagnostic and Management Reasoning: The model exhibited high-quality reasoning in both diagnosis and management tasks, outperforming humans and GPT-4.
b. In which areas did the AI model show no significant improvements?
Probabilistic Reasoning: The model's performance on probabilistic reasoning tasks was similar to that of past models, including GPT-4, and did not show significant improvement.
Triage Differential Diagnosis: While the model performed well in identifying "cannot-miss" diagnoses, it did not significantly outperform GPT-4, attending physicians, or residents in this area.
What are the broader implications of these findings for the use of AI in clinical medicine?
a. What are the potential benefits of using AI in clinical decision-making?
Improved Diagnostic Accuracy: AI could assist clinicians in making more accurate diagnoses, potentially reducing diagnostic errors and delays.
Enhanced Clinical Reasoning: AI could support clinicians in complex reasoning tasks, leading to better patient management.
Mitigation of Diagnostic Error Costs: AI tools could help reduce the human and financial costs associated with diagnostic errors.
b. What are the limitations and challenges associated with integrating AI into clinical practice?
High-Risk Endeavor: Applying AI to clinical decision support is considered high-risk due to the potential for errors and the need for safety and reliability.
Need for Real-World Evaluation: More trials are needed to evaluate these technologies in real-world patient care settings.
Integration Challenges: Integrating AI tools into existing clinical workflows requires careful planning and investment in infrastructure and training.
Monitoring and Oversight: Robust monitoring frameworks are needed to oversee the broader implementation of AI clinical decision support systems.
Unrealistic Benchmarks: Existing benchmarks may not be realistic proxies for high-stakes medical reasoning.
What are the limitations of this study, as acknowledged by the authors?
Verbosity: The o1-preview model tends to be verbose, which may have influenced scoring in some experiments.
Model Performance Only: The study reflects only model performance and does not fully capture human-computer interaction, which can be unpredictable.
Limited Scope: The study examined only five aspects of clinical reasoning, and there are many other tasks that could be studied.
Internal Medicine Focus: The study focused on internal medicine and may not be representative of broader medical practice.

What is the central theme of this research paper?
The central theme of this research paper is to evaluate the performance of a specific large language model (LLM), called o1-preview, on medical reasoning tasks that are typically performed by physicians. The study aims to determine whether this LLM can achieve superhuman performance in these tasks and how it compares to both human physicians and previous AI models, particularly GPT-4.
a. What specific type of AI model is being evaluated? The AI model being evaluated is a large language model (LLM) called "o1-preview." It is developed by OpenAI and is designed to increase run-time via a chain-of-thought process before generating a response.
b. What is the key capability of this AI model that is being tested? The key capability being tested is the model's ability to perform complex clinical reasoning, including differential diagnosis generation, presentation of reasoning, probabilistic reasoning, and management reasoning.
How was the AI model's performance traditionally evaluated, and what are the limitations of these methods?
Traditionally, LLMs in medicine have been evaluated using multiple-choice question benchmarks.
Limitations:
Highly Constrained: These benchmarks are often highly constrained and do not reflect the complexity of real clinical scenarios.
Saturated: LLMs have shown repeated impressive performance on these benchmarks, making it difficult to differentiate between models or identify areas for improvement.
Unclear Relationship to Real Clinical Performance: Performance on these benchmarks may not translate to real-world clinical effectiveness.
Vulnerable to Exploitation: There is evidence that models may be exploiting the structure of multiple-choice questions, rather than demonstrating true understanding.
a. What alternative evaluation method is proposed in this paper? This paper proposes evaluating the o1-preview model using a series of experiments that involve complex, multi-step clinical reasoning tasks adjudicated by physician experts. This method aims to better reflect the challenges of real clinical practice.
What were the five specific experiments conducted to evaluate the AI model's performance?
Differential Diagnosis Generation: Evaluating the model's ability to generate a list of possible diagnoses based on clinical case information from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) Clinicopathological Conferences (CPCs).
Presentation of Reasoning: Assessing the model's ability to document its clinical reasoning process using NEJM Healer Diagnostic Cases and the R-IDEA scoring system.

👇
@chatgpt_prom

▶️-By MEDIROBOT© telegram

📎Our YouTube Channel - https://youtube.com/@medirobot96
📎My Twitter Account - https://x.com/raddoc96
📎Our WhatsApp Channel -
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va7em0M3QxS58ILSbl2q

33.Nice website to create powerpoint presentation with AI by uploading any article pdf / pasting our text content.

👇

https://gamma.app/

In free plan, maximum 10 slides can be produced..In paid plan , upto 30 slides can be produced.
@Medicine_Chatgpt

To use the new o1 model from openai for free

👇

https://huggingface.co/spaces/yuntian-deng/o1

https://openai01.net/en

29.The new model called O1's ability in medical related and other tasks.

Nice study providing a comprehensive evaluation of OpenAI's o1-preview LLM.

Shows strong performance across many tasks:

- competitive programming
- generating coherent and accurate radiology reports
- high school-level mathematical reasoning tasks
- chip design tasks
- anthropology and geology
- quantitative investing
- social media analysis
... and many other domains and problems.

👇

https://t.me/Medical_journals_and_updates/86826

▶️New interesting updates on  Google notebook llm..
👇
-You can even use non ocred pdf.
-Audio podcast option is there by which you can create a free audio podcast generated by ai for the document you have uploaded.It is very realistic and I will show you a demo of audio podcast created by it using this document that I have uploaded - https://t.me/Medical_journals_and_updates/86016

And it is the free audio podcast made by the notebookllm ai for my document
👇

28. Yesterday, A new powerful AI LLM model has been introduced by Openai called o1.

The big difference in this new model is - It answers the user's question by using reasoning steps within, similar to how humans think thoroughly and answer for a question.

You can see the difference in answering a complex medical question by GPT 4o vs o1 model.

👇

Input question - https://t.me/Medical_journals_and_updates/85952

Wrong❌ Answer by GPT 4o for this question - https://t.me/Medical_journals_and_updates/85953

Correct✅ Answer by newly introduced o1 model for this question by using chain of thoughts(reasoning steps) - https://t.me/Medical_journals_and_updates/85954


@medicine_chatgpt

27.A good app for medical students
👇

Free AI Audio reader for pdf / webpage reading

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.elevenlabs.readerapp


Recently, ElevenLabs introduced their Reader app for Android and iOS for free. It is very nice to use if you prefer to study by listening to PDF pages or website content. Instead of a robotic voice, the speech is very natural, almost indistinguishable from a human voice.